Partnerships between private
security entities and governments have been increasingly evident recently. We
have seen a growth in security contractors working on military bases, on
American Embassies, or working other jobs for the government. Though it would
seem that these private security companies would detract from the authority of
a state, this partnership with governments in fact enhances their authority.
Utilizing
a private security company to achieve a government’s goals is a great way of
achieving their interests while avoiding major political repercussions. Though
there will be some backlash due to the government or a nations association with
these companies, it is greatly reduced when compared to a direct government
action. Hiring private security companies allow the government to reduce its
military presence. Reducing this military presence while increasing the
contractor’s employed in a certain area can maintain a presence while reducing
the number of military personnel deployed there.
This
reduction in military presence serves multiple purposes. Firstly, domestically
the general population is happy to hear we are “bringing home the troops”. It gives
a false sense of closure and removal from a situation, for example the
reduction of troops in Afghanistan. Though we brought home a majority of the
troops, there are still many contractors working there, particularly those who
are deployed there temporarily. Many of these contractors choose to work there,
particularly with the hazard pay they will receive, whereas many military
members do not choose to be deployed there.
In
addition, reducing military presence and filling those slots with private
contractors allows a larger portion of the defense budget to be utilized for
other causes. Not only can we refocus our resources into areas that need it,
but it also creates additional jobs, which in turn helps the economy
domestically. Many of these private security companies employ locals or foreign
nationals, which means they are also helping their economy. Having these locals
working so closely linked with our government improves relations with locals
and the international community in general. Having local guards at American
Embassies for example reinforces the legitimization of both nations, us
trusting them and wanting to work closely with them and them valuing our
embassy and the responsibility of guarding it.
I think
for these and more reasons partnerships between private security entities and
governments, not only ours, have become increasingly popular. The number of
private security contractors is very large, not only those who work full time
but also those who deploy temporarily. There are obviously some difficulties
with relying so heavily on private security entities from security issues, to
responsibility for some of their actions, however, I think for now governments
see the benefits outweigh their negatives.
Interesting post, Olivia. I think the key element that might be missing is that the positives drawn from private security corporations might vary from country to country. These benefits are not the same/at all similar across cases.
ReplyDelete