Wednesday, August 13, 2014

The Danger of Internal Dysfunction



This week’s debate on the greatest threat to American power sparked a lot of differing views, but there was a fairly universal belief that America’s greatest threat comes from within. The country’s own politics and internal dysfunction could ultimately be what causes it to slip. But would a few simple policy changes here and there really prevent the US from losing its grasp on much of the world’s power? Is a better functioning government really the only thing necessary to prevent a decline in US clout? I believe it is. The US has so many traits which will allow it to succeed in the future if internal dysfunction doesn’t get in the way.

The US economy, despite being hit hard by the global recession, is still one of the most powerful and vibrant in the world. While concerns about mounting US debt and a growing percentage of the budget allocated to entitlements must be addressed, the US economy overall is still poised for success. The US is still at the forefront of most technological and scientific developments. For instance, the US dominates the field of nanotechnology, which many say will lead fundamental scientific breakthroughs for the next few decades. The US has issued more nanotech patents than the rest of the world combined. Additionally, biotechnology continues to grow in the US and represents 76% of the global market. Many politicians cite the loss of manufacturing jobs to countries like China as a threat to the US economy. But most products manufactured overseas are still designed and engineered in the US. The engineering behind the electronics assembled in China represents the true value of the product, and that value often lies in Silicon Valley. The US economy does have issues which need to be tackled by policy makers, but the overall economic landscape is still vibrant and shows potential to succeed well into the future.

Education is one area often cited as a great example of how the US is falling behind compared to the rest of the world. It is hard to argue that fundamental change isn’t needed to improve the nation’s primary and secondary schools. However, the US university system is still the best in the world and attracts top talent from around the globe. The US receives about 30% of the world’s international students and has most of the universities ranked in the top 10 globally. Other countries are improving their university systems but none will rival the US for decades. Creating a top notch educational institution doesn’t happen overnight. By being able to attract top minds throughout the world, the US holds a strategic advantage which will allow the country to thrive.

There are many who fear the rise of China’s military will put them on the same military footing as the US within a few years. While Chinese defense spending is rising, it’s unlikely they will be able to match US capabilities. The US is technologically superior to any military on the face of the planet because of its robust and sophisticated defense contractor contingent. Various US defense companies will continue to develop new technologies which give the US the edge on the battlefield. However, massive cuts in defense spending threaten to slow new technological developments. This highlights the importance for policy makers to come to agreements on sound economic policies which don’t paralyze the DoD.

There are numerous other characteristics of the US which speak to its ability to remain one of the world’s dominate powers. However, the world is changing and America must learn to adapt with it. Economies and militaries around the world are growing at a rapid rate which doesn’t seem likely to slow down anytime soon. This shouldn’t be seen as a threat to the US, but the country cannot stay stagnant while the rest of the world moves forward. Internal gridlock poses the greatest threat to America’s ability to adapt to a changing world and remain at the top of the world’s food chain.

References:
Fareed Zakaria, "The Future of American Power: How America Can Survive the Rise of the Rest," Foreign Affairs 87 (2008): 18.

No comments:

Post a Comment